Answered

Suppose the writer of a report on caterpillars received all of these comments during a peer review. Which comment should the writer ignore and not follow?
1.“The quote about caterpillars that can cause problems in vegetable gardens was good, but you need to introduce the quote.”
2.“I like the paragraph on how some caterpillars sting. I think you should add information on why they sting.”
3.2“Caterpillars look kind of like worms. You should add a paragraph on worms.”
4.“I really liked your description of how a caterpillar moves. I think some pictures of one moving would help me understand even better.”

Answer :

Answer:

Caterpillars look kind of like worms. You should add a paragraph on worms.” This quote contains irrelevant or impertinent information about worms instead of the main idea, caterpillars.

Explanation: :]

azikennamdi

The writer would do well to ignore the following review:
“I really liked your description of how a caterpillar moves. I think some pictures of one moving would help me understand even better." (Option D).

Why should the writer ignore option D?

The writer would do well to ignore reveiws that are irrelevant and irrational. Option D is irrational because the writer asks for the picture of a moving catapillar.

Pictures don't show moving objects.

Learn more about reveiws at:
https://brainly.com/question/25658249

Other Questions