Answer :
Nate did not write correctly. His function is identical to the century function.
The new function needs to be
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1/10})^n[/tex] where n is now every year since 1960.
Check: if n=10, then y= population 10 years from 1960, or 1970
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1/10})^{10}[/tex]
=>
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1/10 * 10 })[/tex]
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1})[/tex] as in the original equation for 1 decade from 1960
Note: [tex]1.175^{1/10}=1.016257553692097[/tex] approximately
The new function needs to be
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1/10})^n[/tex] where n is now every year since 1960.
Check: if n=10, then y= population 10 years from 1960, or 1970
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1/10})^{10}[/tex]
=>
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1/10 * 10 })[/tex]
[tex]y=10942(1.175^{1})[/tex] as in the original equation for 1 decade from 1960
Note: [tex]1.175^{1/10}=1.016257553692097[/tex] approximately